THE IMPORTANCE OF RECORDING

THE MEDICAL HISTORY

 

Every practising dentist has a responsibility to maintain good quality clinical records.  This has been clearly stated by the GDC and also reinforced by bodies such as the BDA and GDPA.  Clinical records are fundamental to the process of the delivery of dental care, contributing to the diagnosis, planning and correct sequencing of treatment.  Moreover, accurate records are essential to ensuring that patients receive appropriate and safe treatment.  A comprehensive, up-to-date medical history comprises one of several components of good clinical records.

 

The systematic taking of a general medical history by dentists is important for several reasons, all of which are closely related to the quality of care provided to patients:

 

 

 

 

 

 

In summary, the recording of an accurate medical history is in the best interest of patients and dental staff alike.

 

Aims and Objectives

 

 

 

The Set Standard

 

The standard for this clinical audit is defined as follows:

 

 

95% of all patients’ records should satisfy ALL the following FIVE criteria

 

1.         A medical history form should be present in the record card      

 

2.         A medical history form should be signed and dated (the day of completion) by the patient / parent /guardian

 

3.         The medical history form should be updated at the last recall appointment

 

4.         Every question on the medical history form should be answered (yes/no), including those dealing with personal details and doctor’s information

 

5.         All details of the medication (if appropriate) including the name(s) and dosage(s) of drugs taken should be recorded

 

Methods and Materials

 

Selection of Subjects

 

A total of 150 patient record cards consisting of 50 from each of the three dentists working at the practice were selected by systematic random means.  This involved taking the first 50 record cards from each dentist’s schedule file.  No specific inclusion or exclusion criteria were applied, i.e. all 150 record cards selected were included in the present study.

 

Data Collection

 

A pro forma was designed to collect information from each of the 150 patient record cards (figure 1) and was completed by simply placing a tick in the relevant “yes” or “no” box next to each of the five criteria defined by the set standard.

 

 

                Figure 1

 

CRITERIA

YES

NO

MH form in card

 

 

MH form signed and dated

 

 

MH form updated at last recall appointment

 

 

Every question answered on MH form

 

 

All details of medication recorded

 

 

 

 

 

 

Re-Evaluation of the Set Standard

 

After the first audit cycle, the set standard was modified and defined as follows:

 

95% of all patients’ records should satisfy ALL the following FIVE criteria

 

1.         A medical history form should be present in the record card

 

2.         A medical history form should be signed and dated (the day of completion) by the patient / parent /guardian

 

3.         The medical history form should be updated at the last recall appointment

 

4.         Every question on the medical history form should be answered (yes/no), including those dealing with personal details and doctor’s information

 

5.         All details of the medication (if appropriate) including the name(s) of the drugs taken should be recorded

 

 

N.B.  Only Criterion 5 has been modified – the “dosage(s)” of the drugs taken has been omitted

 

Graph

 

 

 

Conclusions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix

 

A table to show the standard achieved for each criterion in Cycles 1 and 2

of the Clinical Audit

 

 

STANDARD CRITERIA

NUMBER (n) / PERCENTAGE (%) OF PATIENTS

AUDIT CYCLE 1

AUDIT CYCLE 2

n

%

n

%

MH form present in card

 

149

99.3

150

100.0

MH form signed and dated

 

149

99.3

148

98.7

MH form updated at last recall appointment

88

 

58.7

150

100.0

Every question on MH form answered

138

92.0

137

91.3

All details of medication recorded

110

73.3

147

98.0

 

 

A table to show the standard achieved overall in Cycles 1 & 2 of the Clinical Audit compared to the set standard (95%)

 

 

STANDARD ACHIEVED

(n – number of patients,  % = percentage of patients)

 

n

%

AUDIT CYCLE 1

68

45.3

AUDIT CYCLE 2

134

89.3

SET STANDARD

142.5

95.0